blank.gif (807 bytes)

home

Ass. M.A. Viktorija KOLAROVSKA-GMIRJA
Faculty of Music Arts Skopje

About Us
Youth Podium
Chamber Orchestra
Internat. co-operation
Summer Music Camp
Festivals
Audio Production
About Us
Institutions directory
Promotion
Young musicians
Young composers
Local
     Concerts and Events
International
     Concerts
and Events
"Musica info"

Links

Contact

 

THE MUSIC EDUCATION IN THE FUTURE-PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES

Speaking about the music education in the future, we actually speak about the presence, we analyze it, we see its good and bad sides, we think what we would like to keep, what to avoid, we make judgements, trying to foreseen something for the future. The educational problems might be explained roughly through the following basic questions: what is learned, how it is learned, and maybe, last but not least, why we learn.

What is learned refers to the content of the educational programs. It is widely known that the music educational has always been connected with the music practice of the current time of living, e.g. with its presence. However, in this century we have encountered an explosion of information connected with the music field by broadening up the borders of the very term “music”: the conquest of the, so far unexplored and peripheral areas of non-European music, the revolutionary development of the professional European music, the invention of new technical methods and sound resources. Yet, unlike the previous epoch, the music studies’ programs today are more conservative, basing themselves on the past music, e.g. limited in time and space on a very small and exactly in space located period. Another important moment refers to the educational subjects executed in various music departments-their number, title, essence, variability and choice possibilities. In that sense, the educational subjects and their content, in one word, the educational programs are interactively influenced by both the principles of static and dynamics. Therefore, the appropriate estimation of the mutual interaction between those two principles is one of the important factors when we talk about the modernization of the music education.

In this point we move towards the other question, e.g. how we learn? It contains two aspects: organizational and methodological. Of course, it is quite clear that the information has increased, while the time limit of the educational courses has remained the same, not being in position to enlarge them endlessly with a never-ending line of new and newer content. In that sense, we can foreseen several possibilities: 1) Implementation of the principle of permanent education lasting during the period of the regular studies in terms of seminars, summer schools, parallel courses containing various problems in the field of modern music and similar, various forms of postgraduating studies on certain specific and concrete subjects; 2) Connection between all levels of education which might be possible only when there is a clear vision over the complete educational process and its final result. The ordinary, the high and the university education processes must have their own clear aims and they must provide maximum quality and detailed knowledge within certain frameworks, not aiming to provide and elaborate everything. Yet, it is a common thing to duplicate the contents of the educational subjects on different levels of education that makes the educational program extensive-so, instead of going forward, we encounter a simple time marking. Important task should be-the struggle to intensify the education, not by increasing the number of the classes, but by enriching their content and aims.

Another aspect is the methodology of the music education. For sure, it is not possible within this elaboration to explain the complexity of the problem (theoretical education, instrumental education, basic education etc.). We shall only remind ourselves that, similar to the educational programs’ content, there is moment of mutual interaction between the principles of static and dynamics within the methodology. Every method and approach counting both the traditional and the new ones (visualization, verbalization, dance etc.) should not be taken outside the natural ways of receiving the music-most of all, considering the live intonation. Therefore the famous didactical principle of interaction between the theory and the practice in the music education should play an important and suptil role: all of the abstract and theoretical explanations are futile if not backed by practical experiences and real music (singing, dancing, hearing, music movements). A complete vision and acceptance of the music phenomena should not be separated from the complete life experiences of the child.

Thus we come to the question “Why we learn”? E.g. the question of the social functions and the meaning of the music as part of the Art-in certain period and in certain background. In other words, that can be called, “music background”-its character, content, specifics…What kind of theater and music life, what kind of repertoire policy of the mass media we have, what is the music taste and what are the preferences of the social classes of the population, are their cultural needs satisfied, is there a choice, what is the tradition of music acceptance-sensual, intellectual, followed by words and process, e.g. is there a link on the relation “composer-performer-audience-critics”. All this has an important meaning that might increase or decrease the social status of the music and in the process of defining the social role of the music in the society. That also has certain impacts over the creation of the personality of the participants in the music process, including the youngest. The role of the quality music background has no less importance in the music education than the high-grade programs and educational methods.

Bearing on mind all of this, we can imagine the educational structure containing three dimensions: vertical-connection of the three levels of music education (primary-high-university); horizontal-high-grade music background as reflection of the highly ranked social status of the music; internal dimension-the quality of the content of the music education. In that sense, working today, we are defining the future, while the professional behavior of the future generations depends directly from the professionalism today. Flexibility, adjustments to the modern ways of life, dialectical between the traditional and the modern, stable and mobile, static and dynamics, all those things are asked by the music education today. The education of the present, while speaking about the future, must incorporate the information, the flow of professional stuff and personnel, ideas’ exchange and permanent up-grades.

<< back